|
Post by Robert Johnson on Jan 7, 2022 22:56:55 GMT -6
Samantha Lewis from ABC Sport is inciting racial hatred and hatred against non-vaccinated people at the same time, when she said that Australia can not let a "white unvaccinated person inside", when she refered to the tennis player Novak Djokovic
|
|
|
Post by Rob W. Case on Jan 9, 2022 19:47:13 GMT -6
Samantha Lewis from ABC Sport is inciting racial hatred and hatred against non-vaccinated people at the same time, when she said that Australia can not let a "white unvaccinated person inside", when she refered to the tennis player Novak Djokovic I have been studying communism extensively for nearly two decades now, and when you have a government apparatus that seeks complete and total control, it gets high level people in positions of influence (within the confines of corporate mass media) who are more than willing to do their part to be involved in complicit activity that works to fulfill a desired end. And a part of that is pitting people against each other, dividing people, and inciting hyper emotional appeals and reactions to try and pressure the masses to comply with the objectives they want established and/or enforced.
Racial politics is merely just another ploy in the political toolbox of activist bullies who try to pressure people to conform to their aggressive approach. The problem with this approach is that it's cheap, desperate, instant, yet overused. The tactic's overuse and baselessness has put it in the neighborhood of "crying wolf". When someone plays racial politics, and it is indeed baseless, people will start to tune them out. Putting a racial political spin on COVID is ridiculous, but it is just another ploy that makes it more difficult to take it seriously, however these activists cannot help themselves, and have no sense as to how their political approach is causing people to reject everything that they have to say.
Most of our mainstream media's corporate headquarters resides in New York and California, and these states are heavily submerged in identity politics. Actually all of our solid blue states maximize the identity political approach to the degree that when you and I see or hear rhetoric that reeks of identity politics, it is overwhelmingly obvious to us that these people are "out to lunch" and completely disconnected from reality, that there is no hope of them ever coming back.
Tying this in with COVID is exceptionally dangerous because it has already been overly politicized to such a degree, that the believability factor, the credibility factor, seriousness aspect, and everything that is required to take a potential threat like this seriously, has already been squandered (to an independent thinker), though they keep finding new ways to guilt, coerce, force, and pressure people (all in various aspects) to take a "vaccine" that is still not technically a vaccine. At this time, all shots remain under Emergency Use Authorization, which means that individuals have the “option to accept or refuse.” The pressure to force people to accept is heavy and is comprised of numerous political approaches, as I'm sure you well know. Right now, the only FDA approved COVID shot is Comirnaty, but definitions are meanings are being wrongfully thrown around by our government and compliant corporate media, as they continue to play politics and generate falsehoods to capitalize off of people's fear to maximize the number of consumers of the shot.
All too often now, we get our news, information, and sense of reality from political activists who are more bent on influencing an outcome or objective, than they are about sharing information and letting you decide. If and when you pay attention to detail, the scarier this "new normal" becomes.
|
|
|
Post by mrright on Jan 9, 2024 23:38:28 GMT -6
brainwashed idiots
|
|
|
Post by rampage on Jan 13, 2024 21:00:54 GMT -6
Samantha Lewis from ABC Sport is inciting racial hatred and hatred against non-vaccinated people at the same time, when she said that Australia can not let a "white unvaccinated person inside", when she refered to the tennis player Novak Djokovic Superficially, meaning without context, it surely seems so.
RC post #2: I appreciate decades of study, but do not recognize the connection between communism and broadcast television. Australians? Sport fans?
COVID patients?
|
|
|
Post by rampage on Jan 13, 2024 21:24:47 GMT -6
"Most of our mainstream media's corporate headquarters resides in New York and California, and these states are heavily submerged in identity politics. Actually all of our solid blue states maximize the identity political approach to the degree that when you and I see or hear rhetoric that reeks of identity politics, it is overwhelmingly obvious to us that these people are "out to lunch" and completely disconnected from reality, that there is no hope of them ever coming back." RC Your vehemence is obvious. Your reasoning (if any) is not. Scare quotes, as in "out to lunch" is condemnation / dismissal, not logical refutation.
|
|
|
Post by Rob W. Case on Jan 28, 2024 19:19:35 GMT -6
Samantha Lewis from ABC Sport is inciting racial hatred and hatred against non-vaccinated people at the same time, when she said that Australia can not let a "white unvaccinated person inside", when she refered to the tennis player Novak Djokovic Superficially, meaning without context, it surely seems so. RC post #2: I appreciate decades of study, but do not recognize the connection between communism and broadcast television. Australians? Sport fans?
COVID patients?
Really? Broadcast television is infested with ideological Marxists. That's obviously HOW these people say or imply these inane concepts. It is so bad and so obvious that reasonable minds reject their politicizing everything. In this case, equating an "unvaccinated" with being a racist is an action that militant activists do when they are engaging in racial politics. I don't know what the problem is with seeing how obvious it is. Is it cognitive dissonance? Is it willful blindness? Is it obliviousness to the obvious? This is why Donald Trump is leading so handily in the polls now and decimating into "powder" all of the "Republicans" who are running against him. When all broadcasters do is bitch endlessly about one person, shut out inconvenient truths that threaten their agenda (which is why more and more is coming out revealing the underpinnings of COVID), and go out of their way to rationalize and justify the mumbling, bumbling buffoon we have in the White House, you lose your credibility as an objective, fact seeking journalist. Everything becomes politics, activism, and promoting certain people and their agendas.
Whenever people talk like this, there is no basis to what they say. So in that position, people disregard them. I don't know how or why that is so hard to understand. Let's use the subject of the 70+ genders that are supposedly out there. The Biden administration is the most iron fisted, zealous, crusaders for transgenderism that I have ever seen, and when you hear the people who are promoting this nonsense speak, it is abundantly clear that they are "out to lunch" with no hope of ever returning. Such insanity is nonsense, and its influence incubates predominantly in left-leaning areas.
When this sort of nonsense eclipses the important things (like people dying on account of the COVID shots for example), or the omission of and attack against important information (like ignoring all COVID shot deaths), while still promoting the COVID shot, something stinks. In my study on Communism, the subject of propaganda makes too obvious what is occurring in our broadcast media because of the things I just mentioned.
|
|
|
Post by rampage on Jan 28, 2024 19:51:25 GMT -6
Broadcast television is infested with ideological Marxists. I have neither satellite, nor cable TV. But I get about 40 digital TV channels from my roof antenna, including PBS. I consider them commercial broadcasts. Commercial broadcast television in the U.S. doesn't exist to bring entertainment to audiences. It exists to bring prospective $consumers to commercial sponsors.
In school (over a half-century ago) I read Marx & Engles' The Communist Manifesto cover to cover. My memory of it has faded, though I suppose the copyright on it if ever any has lapsed, and thus may well be available for free download / pdf. I gather one of us has an unconventional definition of "ideological Marxists".
I've struggled to find a plausible example to support your above quoted allegation. Failed. Please cite 3 examples, to clarify, verify your intended point. Thanks in advance.
Marx·ism (märksĭz′əm) n. The political and economic philosophy of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in which the concept of class struggle plays a central role in understanding society's allegedly inevitable development from bourgeois oppression under capitalism to a socialist and ultimately classless society. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Edition copyright ©2022 by HarperCollins Publishers. All rights reserved.
|
|
|
Post by rampage on Jan 28, 2024 20:03:22 GMT -6
That sir is political conservatism:
We are all god's children sir, as god made us. I have no authority, no reason, no benefit to judging them or anyone else. You?
You may not have intended to do so RW, but you have paid President Biden a sincere and flattering compliment by acknowledging Biden's stalwart political conservatism.
|
|