Centrists, Right-Wingers, Marcon, Etd....

[QualityGradation]

              I think Marcon was the best choice for the french to make- even though viewpoints I've expressed would appear to be more in harmony with those of Ms. Le Pen...  for some reason, the Centrist will be best for France, I believe!
            My viewpoint is that no moslems should be permitted residence in any of these countries; never should have been admitted- the governments have made an error in judgement, which I attribute to High Civilization Rational Error- the tendency during high civilization epochs to err on the side of inattention to crucial foundational issues.   One such issue is that you cannot Integrate moslems into our society, and should better stop trying- there is incredible danger in this, more than people realize, I think!  The moslem religion is Isogenic- it cannot be combined with other religions, for which reason you should have no countries with moslems mixed with other religionites.  How many offences must we endure, before the governments take radical action, in conformity with these simple precepts?!  You invite even more serious offences with the weak-handed deluded liberality in such matters!  
            There should be no moslems in Hawaii, neither Canada- best.  I'm claiming that this is actually the Will and Foredesign of Providence, regarding the composition of these countries... through another government Error, we have a great many negroes here, in America, which I do not think is in accordance with Providence Foredesign regarding this nation, either.  The malpractise has caused and is causing untold trouble- something better for everyone concerned, including the negroes, could have been arranged!
            1947 would have been the best time to put a stop to Mexican immigrations, as also certain other types, too- the warm-hearted feelings of love and respect for Mexico and Mexicans should continue; by less wise immigrations practice this natural affection has been damaged more than abetted!   We are overpopulated at present...
               

             

[QualityGradaition]

             P.S.    The president of a great country like France- the modern day development after "Le Roi de Soleil"- if iterating such stances openly- on the Exoteric or External Plane, that of Expression- would probably be subjecting themselves to some nervous strain and possibly increase that in others too, I think; for that caste, such viewpoints could be held, or given breath in the more Esoteric, or Subliminal Selves, currently.
          Although one aeon a male might be better than a female for president, generally- as perhaps also vice versa in another aeon- it has nothing whatsoever to do with gender that I favor the election of Marcon... 

      

[Rob W. Case]

In reply to your comments.....


Election in France, Immigration:

I have a different view on the election of France. I believe very strongly that the overall electorate in France is frightfully apathetic, socially conditioned, and so easily swayed by their pre-established fears and prejudices that they cannot think in a sensible manner. In other words, what might be right for them one day, might be wrong for them the next day. They are not grounded by any objective, pragmatic reality. And I’m not just saying that because I am looking at the French with “American colored glasses” either. Take, for example, neighboring Germany where, because of European Globalism, Germany picks up much of the tab for other nations within the European Union that are failing. In other words, Germany is “bailing out” other countries. Under an elite few, the needs of the European Union outweigh the needs of individual, sovereign countries, and many of the countries within the global body are suffering because of that. And with France, rhetorically speaking at least, Marie Le Pen was the only candidate with a steel spine who campaigned on the interests of France’s individual sovereign interests, and in that, framed the contrast between her and Emmanuel Macron as her for France, and Macron for the European Union. That said, with the success of Macron’s election, coupled with his favor among the body of the European Union, he will most likely govern in the interests of the globalists who formulate the policies and advancement of the European Union, which means that, for example, we can expect that he will not handle radical Islamic extremism in a bold and unique way, and that the problem with extremism will worsen, as fundamentalists grow bolder knowing and exploiting the weak multicultural environment initiated by the EU that Macron will uphold.



Islam and Migration into Western Societies:

I understand your viewpoint in that you feel that Muslims should not be admitted into Western civilizations where our freedom of religion is a fundamental human right, and that in practice, when compared to the tenets of Islam, we as a people fall short as being too conceited, undisciplined, “unholy” and evil, and there are “ways to make people pay” for such “insolence”. However, this strongly occurs in the most conservative sects of Islam (particularly Wahabi and Shiite). Sunnis, depending on the group have become more war minded in recent years and in certain circles, but overall, they have been more liberal religiously and thus more pro-western. And while we cannot stop the immigration of Muslims to the United States, we should definitely not be displacing them (via a refugee relief program) to countries that they are culturally conditioned into believing are evil. However, at the same time, each individual is different, and each individual will see things as they are and as they are told they are, depending on how devoutly religious they are. From there, they can decide and establish their course of beliefs.


African Americans and America:

Now, in your comments, you quickly shifted to African Americans in America. I want to give you a chance to be clear on the context you are referring to. Were you referring to the means for which they were brought over initially, or are you talking about the growing population within that particular demographic? You kind of squeezed that comment in there between Muslim emigration and Mexican migration into the United States, so I’m not sure what you are trying to convey with that comment.


Mexican Immigration:

Now, you said that “1947 would have been the best time to put a stop to Mexican immigrations.” I am assuming that you are referring to that year in particular because that was the year that the “Bracero Program Labor Program of 1942” was scheduled to officially end. For my guests reading this piece who may not be aware of the program, the Bracero Program (a.k.a. The Mexican Labor Program) was a program that was enacted during World War II, when so many Americans were involved in the war effort, that there was a labor shortage (that didn’t require any education or special skills) that Franklin Roosevelt filled using Mexican labor. The program was officially scheduled to end in 1947, but it continued for quite a long time afterwards because American companies became heavily dependent on the program. Bribes were offered to politicians to get contracts, and when you add up the increase in numbers of contracts to employers, we had an explosion of illegal immigration in this country. Of course more can be said about this program, and what it turned into, but money and politics can account for what it was originally to what it evolved into. I am going to stop right there for now.


Mexican Workers:

I want to be clear on something; Mexican workers have contributed much to our economy over the years. A good many of them are very hard working, and contribute a lot, and while this is true, it is not Mexican people we are against. We are against illegal immigration and the money and influence that incubate it by our politicians (of both parties) who want to do nothing about it. President Trump is the first president in a long time to actually pursue reform on this matter, so we will have to keep an eye on his efforts concerning this issue.