Evolution: Seed To Replace God and Control You!

[Rob W. Case]

Since the release of the “Passion of the Christ” last year, more and more people were becoming Christians. I remember going to a midnight church service on Christmas Eve last year, and it was packed unlike I have ever seen before. It was phenomenal. Then, as we sit back and watch, the liberals, act as rebellious children, acting against anything that is morally right and inserting their own definition of what is morally right. It is called “interpreting” and that is what is in the wings when it comes to liberal decision making. Interpretation was what gave us the ruling of Eminent Domain in which now the government can steal away our property out from under us.

During the 2004 campaign, John Kerry was the epitome of the rebellious. If you read the Bible, he would have most of the classifications of what the Bible calls a double-minded man. Whenever Kerry tried to move to the right, his voting record came out and said that he is contradicting himself.

Well, now it is mid 2005, and an old rebellious philosophy is rearing its head once again. The philosophy is the old theory of evolution, repackaged for the 21st Century. As I was sitting in the movie theater, there was a trailer playing, promoting a new miniseries regarding Evolution for the History Channel.

As Christianity rises once again, an attempt to counter it with the theory of Darwinism, like clock work, has to come out of the ashes and compete against God and Creation.

The failed doctrine is re-released in hopes to capture new minds and shape new belief systems. As I channel surfed, I came across many Christian programs that were addressing evolution this week and will continue to do so as the week progresses. Dr. D. James Kenney, an aggressive historian and preacher, proved that, through quotations of scientists who worked with Darwin, that Darwinism failed as early as the 1920’s. The TV Show “The Way of the Master” starring Ray Comfort and “Growing Pains” and “Left Behind” star Kirk Cameron decided to have fun on their show, by calling airlines and asking them if they could bring a relative with them on the plane. The “relative” was an orangutan. The airlines said NO because orangutans are primates, and animals are not allowed on airplanes. Ray Comfort then asked if he believed in evolution, and that his wanting the monkey on the plane is the same principle.

Why Evolution Exists:

The science of it is junk, and can never be properly proven. There are too many holes. If there were missing links between ape and man, then the fossils would be all over the place, and yet we cannot find one. We keep finding cavemen with arthritis, or pig bones that resemble humans, but we cannot find what evolution calls a “missing link.” But why does evolution exist? Communism, Nazism, and today, liberalism all based in evolution. Evolution is a fool’s way of cutting themselves off from accountability to God, and replacing God with a belief system in which humans can play God and make decisions that pertain to life and death.

Think about it:

Abortion: Where humans in 1973 deemed it okay to murder unborn children. The court ruling was based on a lie, according to the woman who was Roe (Norma Mc Ervey) in the Roe V. Wade decision. Since then, she has become a Christian and has regretted being responsible for implementing Roe V. Wade ever since.

“We cannot diminish the value of one category of human life-the unborn- without diminishing the value of all human life. We saw tragic proof of this truism last year when the Indiana courts allowed the starvation death of “Baby Doe” in Bloomington because the child had Down’s syndrome.”—Ronald Reagan (Abortion and the Conscience of the Nation)

Euthanasia: The Terry Schiavo case was the perfect example, right to the tee. The politicians who were Christians, which happened to be mostly Republican, as well as a few Democrats, pushed for the life of Terry Schiavo in the context that they believed that they should not play God and determine whether or not the woman should live or die.

Trusting Evil: It’s interesting to me that the same people who profess that they are agnostic, and believe in evolution are the same people who think that we can reason with a determined enemy that is ready to kill us at any open chance they get. In their minds, human nature can be changed from corruptible to incorruptible overnight. That is why, in reality, prisoners who are released go out and repeat their crimes over and over again.

Evolution sets a foundation for no moral accountability. Since evolution has been set, Karl Marx, Adolph Hitler, China, and Cuba have been responsible for rightly justifying “in their own eyes” hundreds of thousands of murders throughout the years.


The Godfather of Communism once wrote, "Darwin's work is most important and suits my purpose in that it provides a basis in natural science for the historical class struggle. (Karl Marx, personal letters, 16 January 1861)

In Mien Kampf, Adolph Hitler used Darwinian science to “justify” the “impurities” of the Jewish race, and provided a case as to why it is vital to destroy the Jewish race, and spare the blonde hair and blue eyes race, creating a “pure” master race.

Joseph Stalin and Vladimir Lenin starved millions do death to “control the population.” People were so hungry, that right when people died, starved individuals would use the fresh corpses as a source of food.

Charles Darwin grew up with a sense of faith, but he rebelled against God. After reading the book of Genesis, he started to have doubts. Darwin was then surrounded by friends who were rampant self-professed atheists.

Darwin Before: "I often had to run very quickly to be on time, and from being a fleet runner was generally successful; but when in doubt I prayed earnestly to God to help me, and I well remember that I attributed my success to the prayers and not to my quick running, and marvelled how generally I was aided."

Darwin After: "Formerly I was led... to the firm conviction of the existence of God and the immortality of the soul. In my Journal I wrote that whilst standing in the midst of the grandeur of a Brazilian forest, 'it is not possible to give an adequate idea of the higher feelings of wonder, admiration, and devotion, which fill and elevate the mind.' I well remember my conviction that there is more in man than the mere breath of his body. But now the grandest scenes would not cause any such convictions and feelings to rise in my mind."
Since Darwin’s death, and since the crumbling of evolution as a valid scientific theory, self-professed agnostics always try to resurrect the same belief system so that they can use it to shape people’s minds. Translation: People are easier to control when you take God and morality out of the equation.

Off With Their Heads!!!

Governments that has justified their actions on the root of evolution has always, like clock work, persecuted and sent Christians to death camps.

In the Communist Soviet Union, Lenin would have Christians tortured, and then killed for witnessing the testimony of Jesus Christ.

In Nazi Germany, Hitler used scripture as a step to elevate himself to power. Once he got into power, he closed Christian schools all across Germany, and ordered Christians to be killed as well as the burning of Bibles.

In China today, if you are caught witnessing the Bible, or if you are caught praying, then you are subjected to receiving the death penalty. Christianity is a serious offense in China, because it threatens a communist way of life.

In America today, the ACLU and other left-wing agnostic organizations are attempting to do what has been done before. It’s all about cutting God out, so that the lines are blurred when it comes to morality. Then, new lines are drawn as they are dictated by the government.

“Communism is the goal."
--Roger Baldwin, Founder of the ACLU

Do you notice the pattern yet? It’s always about cutting God out of the system. If God was not real, I’m more than convinced that there would not be such an effort to get rid of him and his teachings of peace, love, and compassion, as well as defining what is right and what is wrong. Christianity is peace, and it does not surprise me that liberals continue to wage war on what is actually genuine peace, but with tips on how to preserve it.

Evolution has been instrumental in “justifying” and promoting Atheism, Communism, Socialism, Nazism, and today, in America, liberalism.

[MysteriousGuest X]

Your logic on several points is wrong. First of all, just because Hitler and others used Evolution to explain their actions does not mean that evolution is evil and wrong. Just look at the Crusades. That was a nice religion based war. Also look at the plagues that God brought down on Egypt during Moses's time. That was genocide. Also, with the Shiavo case, we were playing god by keeping her alive. If she was meant to live then she would not have needed machines, that man created, to survive.

Furthermore, fossils are not easy to find. Because of techtonic plate movement, earthquakes, storms, volcanos, and other natural disasters fossils are bound to be destroyed or buried so deep that it takes time to find them. And personally I don't remember the news reporting the where abouts of the garden of edin or Noah's arc.

[Rob W. Case]

MysteriousGuest said:

Your logic on several points is wrong. First of all, just because Hitler and others used Evolution to explain their actions does not mean that evolution is evil and wrong. Just look at the Crusades. That was a nice religion based war. Also look at the plagues that God brought down on Egypt during Moses's time. That was genocide. Also, with the Shiavo case, we were playing god by keeping her alive. If she was meant to live then she would not have needed machines, that man created, to survive.

I will prove that I am correct:

Evolution creates a foundation in which Communism, Nazism, and Liberalism are all based. If we were all created out of nothing (which is in and of itself absurd), then we could not be possibly held to any moral standards.

For example (I hate using it, but it is one of the most effective): What is wrong with a 21 year old having relations with a 14 year old? Biblically, having sex with a 14 year old would be considered wrong, and would generate problems with the 14 year old. If you use evolution as your guide, then really, What's wrong with that? Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the liberal Clinton appointed Justice believes in Evoluition, and she believes that 12 year olds should have the right to consentual sex. Is this a wicked example? Yes, but it fits perfectly with what I'm trying to say.

Comparing evolution with God does not quite seem to be the best way to communicate your thoughts. After all, in this sense, the Crusades were conflicting ideologies. You had Christianity and you had Islam both fighting over the Holy City of Jerusalem. The plagues which you compared to as "genocide" would not be technically genocide in the sense that those measures were used to expose the authenticity of the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and to show that he is not messing around. It was to spark fear in the hearts of men who dare mess with a commandment from God to liberate the Jews. With the Terry Shiavo case, we were playing God in deciding to have the plug pulled on her. After all, when we trust human nature 100%, we trust a hint of corruption and fallicy that causes death and destruction. Think about it: How many times do we get in situations such as dealing with stupid drivers during rush hour, dealing with people who are rude, and so on and think to ourselves, "I want to kill that SOB?" Do we kill the SOB that upsets us? No. We have a moral boundary. It is wrong to kill and therfore there are consequences, should one indulge in the thought. Now, there are some people that would and actually have indulged in following through with a deed such as I mentioned before.

Human Animals:

If we were animals (such as evolution suggests), then we would have to kill or fight each other in order to survive at times. Imagine this scenario. You see a steak, right? Someone else wants your steak. Do you kill them for it? If you follow evolution, then you should be able to, because, after all, you are fighting another "animal" in your "fight" for "survival." But we cannot do it that way. We have consequences. We are not like the lion who is authorized to kill another animal for food and can get away with murder.

Do you see where I'm heading with this? Nothing would be morally wrong. Then there's the issue of junk science, but even a major French scientist dismissed evolution as "a fairy tale for adults."

[MysteriousGuest X]

As a matter of fact we do fight for survival. You may not see it here in America but people do kill each other for food. We are lucky, as we both have access to computers, we have enough money for food. In 3rd world contries many people do not have enough money for food and will kill anything to get it, whether it be man or beast. Also you claim that it is absurd that we were created out of nothing. How is it then that God came into existance? And don't try the normal Christian reply that he "has always existed". Cause if everything has to be created from something, then so does he. It would be absurd to think otherwise.
Also, anothing that preditors do is fight over territory. We humans fight over territory all the time. Just look at Jerusalem. That battle has been going on for hundreds of years.
Furthermore, you explanation of the plagues not being genocide is pathetic. That would be like a nazi explaning that the halocaust was just authenticating Germans as the Arian race. God slaughtered thousands of people just to prove a point. Thats genocide in my book.
In the Shiavo case, we were using machine created by man to KEEP HER ALIVE. If she was 'meant' to live that she would not have needed those machines and would have been able to survive on her body's ability. To say that we were playing god by allowing here to die is just plain stupid. We were playing god by keeping her alive when clearly her body could not survive without help.

[Rob W. Case]

Survival, Man A Beast?:
WE do not fight for survival. THEY fight for survival. Of course, you have cannibalism, like in certain African wildernesses, yet many missionaries have combed and are combing these areas.

Who Created God?
Even I had a hard time with this question at one point. Then, a thought was delivered. We people here on earth have measured time based on our watch. But what kind of a watch would God have? He is not bound by human elements of time. Measuring time is something that we have invented ourselves, via sundials, clocks, calendars, etc. Then there is the point that there is another world beyond the physical realm that you and I see. The only part of the Trinity that is flesh is Jesus. What about God the Father and Spirit? They are Spirits. There are things that we can never understand here on earth. In I believe it is Corinthians, Paul (who used to slaughter Christians, and became one of the greatest Christians who ever lived) wrote about his experience with death. Paul saw what heaven looked like. He saw angels conversing, but the conversation was far more advanced than what we could actually comprehend. If you saw what Paul saw, how could you put that to words? How could we say that God didn’t always exist?

Jerusalem, a Fight Over Territory? :

When the Jews were slaves, they were promised land. They finally got their land. Then, in 586 B.C. King Nebuchadnezzar INVADED Jerusalem (and Israel) and the Jews were scattered amongst Europe and elsewhere. They were driven out of Europe, France, Russia, and other countries, especially Germany. Finally, they said “enough is enough”. They were not going to be driven out of their land any longer, so they implanted themselves back (though War) to where they used to reside. Except, when they came back home, they found some new residents, along with a religion that spawned a belief system. Both system clashed, and therefore re-ignited a feud that originated in the book of Genesis between Hagar and Sarah.

Plagues Genocide?

Genocide is a decision, by man, to kill another man, unless it is in self defense. You mentioned that “God slaughtered thousands of people just to prove a point.” Where is it written that he slaughter thousands to prove a point? The Plagues were sent by God, and whether they were frogs or locusts, or what not, they would do what God intended them to do, and therefore would strike a scare that could have cost people their lives, but I cannot recall a passage where God slaughtered thousands.

Playing God:
You said, “If she [Terry Schiavo] was 'meant' to live that she would not have needed those machines and would have been able to survive on her body's ability. To say that we were playing god by allowing here to die is just plain stupid. We were playing god by keeping her alive when clearly her body could not survive without help.”

If we followed your logic then it would be “just plain stupid” to perform surgery on a cancer patient, or any patient with a terminally ill status . After all, the doctor performing the operation, according to what you wrote, would be playing God by keeping the patient alive when clearly the patient’s body could not survive without outside help. It would also suggest that, if we follow your logic in this matter, then medicine would be an act of playing God by helping to keep people alive.

The machine might have kept her alive, but it is one thing to disconnect a machine (maybe), and another thing to literally starve a person to death. They unplugged the machine, and then starved her to death, which then goes to once again, prove that the theory of evolution, like in Stalin’s Russia, was a way to “justify” mass murder by “controlling the population.” Stalin starved his people to death to decrease the population. That is where the seeds of such thinking originates.