|
Post by bostondave on Dec 9, 2020 17:06:43 GMT -6
OK 4. Courts have looked at everything and found nothing wrong. No fraud no evidence of wrongdoing no facts presented nothing. So, you say what now? They didn't look at everything. I honestly don't know if they really looked at anything, or if they just sat there and "humored" everybody just to check it off their list. You can't have all of these things happen, and say that nothing happened. Just the video alone of the suit cases stuffed with preprinted ballots being pulled out from underneath the tables when the counting was said to be "over for the night" is enough to say that something happened, even if that was (hypothetically speaking of course) the only thing that did happen. They're just ignoring what is being presented, when what is being presented is a violation of the law.
A Case in Point:
In my home state, I attended a meeting in 2012 about ballot tampering and election fraud. After every single election cycle, I would hear on the radio about how many dead people "voted" in the current election cycle, after every election cycle, how much rigging went on, how they would bus people in from the ghetto to vote (with incentives used to get them out), and nothing would ever happen to stop it. It was like an ongoing joke, but one that I did not find funny at all. This meeting was different. The law stated that certain procedures were supposed to be followed in handling, storing, and transporting ballots. The totes that contained the ballots were supposed to be sealed, and they were not sealed. They were supposed to be supervised. They were not supervised. And there were photos of the violations placed next to the texts of the laws and rules that were being violated. But, nothing to see here! We have the fairest and safest election system in the world, we were told. It was corrupt. But man, was it fiercely interesting.
I'm afraid what's happening in the courts now is similar to what happened here in 2012 with what I saw at that meeting. That's why you have to present the case to the state courts. Their ruling/opinion has to also be on record, so that the Supreme Court can weigh the evidence (or lack thereof) in light of the opinion/ruling given by the state court and what all led to that ruling/opinion. If the Supreme Court finds out that there was too much funny business going on, and the state court ignored it, the Supreme Court can hold them accountable. If there is not enough evidence to completely overhaul a national election (and there are many other factors to consider other than just the truth alone), then the outcome may remain as it is currently projected, but there will have to be serious reforms and stricter safeguards that will have to be enacted and enforced by law. So you're rejecting ALL the courts and ALL the cases that have found no evidence? Really? The USSC has no evidence to rule on, there was none presented to any of the courts. None. They've lost all the cases that called for evidence and fact. ALL OF THEM. Not sure what you're hoping for but you won't get it from the USSC. Odd that you're holding out hope that they somehow some way invalidate an entire election. Let me repeat. You're holding out some false hope that the USSC will invalidate 150 million votes I guess. Is that what you're really hoping for? What has led you to such depths? Are you a QAnon? Answer that please because I shouldn't be wasting my time with anyone like that.
|
|
|
Post by Rob W. Case on Dec 9, 2020 19:31:12 GMT -6
They didn't look at everything. I honestly don't know if they really looked at anything, or if they just sat there and "humored" everybody just to check it off their list. You can't have all of these things happen, and say that nothing happened. Just the video alone of the suit cases stuffed with preprinted ballots being pulled out from underneath the tables when the counting was said to be "over for the night" is enough to say that something happened, even if that was (hypothetically speaking of course) the only thing that did happen. They're just ignoring what is being presented, when what is being presented is a violation of the law.
A Case in Point:
In my home state, I attended a meeting in 2012 about ballot tampering and election fraud. After every single election cycle, I would hear on the radio about how many dead people "voted" in the current election cycle, after every election cycle, how much rigging went on, how they would bus people in from the ghetto to vote (with incentives used to get them out), and nothing would ever happen to stop it. It was like an ongoing joke, but one that I did not find funny at all. This meeting was different. The law stated that certain procedures were supposed to be followed in handling, storing, and transporting ballots. The totes that contained the ballots were supposed to be sealed, and they were not sealed. They were supposed to be supervised. They were not supervised. And there were photos of the violations placed next to the texts of the laws and rules that were being violated. But, nothing to see here! We have the fairest and safest election system in the world, we were told. It was corrupt. But man, was it fiercely interesting.
I'm afraid what's happening in the courts now is similar to what happened here in 2012 with what I saw at that meeting. That's why you have to present the case to the state courts. Their ruling/opinion has to also be on record, so that the Supreme Court can weigh the evidence (or lack thereof) in light of the opinion/ruling given by the state court and what all led to that ruling/opinion. If the Supreme Court finds out that there was too much funny business going on, and the state court ignored it, the Supreme Court can hold them accountable. If there is not enough evidence to completely overhaul a national election (and there are many other factors to consider other than just the truth alone), then the outcome may remain as it is currently projected, but there will have to be serious reforms and stricter safeguards that will have to be enacted and enforced by law. So you're rejecting ALL the courts and ALL the cases that have found no evidence? Really? The USSC has no evidence to rule on, there was none presented to any of the courts. None. They've lost all the cases that called for evidence and fact. ALL OF THEM. Not sure what you're hoping for but you won't get it from the USSC. Odd that you're holding out hope that they somehow some way invalidate an entire election. Let me repeat. You're holding out some false hope that the USSC will invalidate 150 million votes I guess. Is that what you're really hoping for? What has led you to such depths? Are you a QAnon? Answer that please because I shouldn't be wasting my time with anyone like that. Texas has filed a lawsuit of enormity now challenging the deviation of these states from the constitution. Some of these last minute decisions in left wing states like PA that were implemented at the last minute, without the proper procedures followed, or authority to do so, has now challenged the constitutionality of all of the lawlessness that was conducted. As of last night, 7 additional states joined in to support this lawsuit, then this morning, it was up to 10. Now, it is up to 17. They have articulated a brilliant argument saying that by following the law and the constitution, they are now being disenfranchised by states that not only did not follow the law or the constitution, but went ahead and did their own thing without the authority to do so, opening the flood gates to widespread fraud and corruption, and the results are tainted because of this. This case will be argued by Ted Cruz at the Supreme Court, and the heat on the justices at the Supreme Court will be more tremendous than ever. We will see what happens.
|
|
|
Post by bostondave on Dec 9, 2020 20:19:46 GMT -6
So you're rejecting ALL the courts and ALL the cases that have found no evidence? Really? The USSC has no evidence to rule on, there was none presented to any of the courts. None. They've lost all the cases that called for evidence and fact. ALL OF THEM. Not sure what you're hoping for but you won't get it from the USSC. Odd that you're holding out hope that they somehow some way invalidate an entire election. Let me repeat. You're holding out some false hope that the USSC will invalidate 150 million votes I guess. Is that what you're really hoping for? What has led you to such depths? Are you a QAnon? Answer that please because I shouldn't be wasting my time with anyone like that. Texas has filed a lawsuit of enormity now challenging the deviation of these states from the constitution. Some of these last minute decisions in left wing states like PA that were implemented at the last minute, without the proper procedures followed, or authority to do so, has now challenged the constitutionality of all of the lawlessness that was conducted. As of last night, 7 additional states joined in to support this lawsuit, then this morning, it was up to 10. Now, it is up to 17. They have articulated a brilliant argument saying that by following the law and the constitution, they are now being disenfranchised by states that not only did not follow the law or the constitution, but went ahead and did their own thing without the authority to do so, opening the flood gates to widespread fraud and corruption, and the results are tainted because of this. This case will be argued by Ted Cruz at the Supreme Court, and the heat on the justices at the Supreme Court will be more tremendous than ever. We will see what happens. You're just full out full bore anti-American aren't you? Willing to just throw away an entire election for a death cult leader? Are you QAnon? You sound like one. I really don't want to waste my time with someone as unhinged as that. Although you might as well be with the way you sound. I don't even want to mention how many of those states legislatures have done exactly the same thing they're suing over. You really want to void an entire election though? Really? We really might be broken as a nation with people like you. Really broken in tatters. We lost elections with none of this bullnuts. What has happened to you?
C;mon stand up, are you QAnon?
|
|
|
Post by Rob W. Case on Dec 9, 2020 20:48:49 GMT -6
I am pro-American constitution, period. This election was not followed by the Constitution and was loaded with so much fraud, making the outcome illegitimate, to benefit a decrepit sellout (prostituting himself as a puppet) supported by every real enemy of America. The Communist Party, Wall Street, international bankers, globalists, and the Nazi collaborator George Soros do not have the interests of this country at heart. They openly admit their plans to bring down the United States, and pride themselves in doing so, so don't even go there, because those are the very types that people like you so often get warm and cozy with and follow without reason or question.
|
|
|
Post by bostondave on Dec 10, 2020 0:19:40 GMT -6
Are you QAnon?
***And that should be it with this USSC decision. The end. Finished. An end to the ugliest episode in American politics. Just some book keeping to do now to finalize. Can't say he didn't get his legal lawful chance. He's excersized and exhausted his rights and now he must go. Period.
***And with the Electors Biden is formally the president-elect of the USA. Done deal. Nothing to be done. Any games played now are just meaningless games that won't amount to anything. Are you ready to concede it's over yet?
|
|
|
Post by gr8granny on Dec 18, 2020 18:49:59 GMT -6
Wow, Rob, you are dealing with a real psycho case in bostondave. I think the guys in the white coats should come pick him up and see if they can make sense of his delusions. My favorite grandson just graduated from boot camp and special training with the National Guard. I am worried that our country will be in some type of civil war if Biden and company actually get into the white house. And they want to take away the 2nd amendment rights!!! How are people supposed to defend themselves and property. Plus we might need some guns to get food like rabbits, squirrels and mmmm deer. Farmers will need to protect their cattle as well. But, then, we might not have cows any more because AOC doesn't like that they fart and pollute the air. I was raised on a diary farm. Yes, they do! But, I bet AOC has been known to "break wind", too.
|
|
|
Post by bostondave on Dec 19, 2020 7:59:42 GMT -6
Traitor and traitorous Americans are finished. As I type this right now Russia has committed yet another act of cyber war and Traitor is saying nothing. Still trying to overturn democracy. This idiot cannot leave soon enough.
|
|
|
Post by gr8granny on Dec 19, 2020 8:22:38 GMT -6
Buckle your seatbelt, dave. It is going to be a bumpy ride.
Why do you think Trump is doing nothing? He delegates that to those who know how to track the cyber attacks. he has other things to do besides jump to do whatever your whims are.
From past experience and training, I can tell you that it might not actually be Russia. It could be China or even Iran and be routed through Russian servers. I took computer programming classes back in the early 90's before I had a disabling wreck. Had to drop out because I needed surgery on my back and medicaid required me not going to college. Pain was so bad I would cry sometimes in class.
|
|
|
Post by bostondave on Dec 19, 2020 15:12:17 GMT -6
WHy is he not doing OR saying anything? Simple, he's a traitor to America. Putin's got something on him. And he owes Putin. It's really quite simple. But it's ok he's finished anyway.
|
|
|
Post by gr8granny on Dec 20, 2020 6:31:29 GMT -6
WHy is he not doing OR saying anything? Simple, he's a traitor to America. Putin's got something on him. And he owes Putin. It's really quite simple. But it's ok he's finished anyway. Look in the mirror, dave! Donnie does not work for Putin or any other foreign agent!! He doesn't even collect the $400,000 per annum salary he is entitled too. That money has gone back into the U.S. coffers.
I'm wondering who is paying you to create these traitorous posts to try influence true patriots. The American public no longer believes is the main stream media reports. Why should they believe YOU?
|
|
|
Post by bostondave on Dec 20, 2020 7:00:05 GMT -6
There was a free and fair election. To overturn democracy is treason. It's done. Goodbye, good riddance.
|
|
|
Post by bostondave on Jan 7, 2021 11:22:37 GMT -6
Twitter and FB ban his account. Better late than never. Less than two weeks now.....
|
|
|
Post by bostondave on Jan 8, 2021 20:17:38 GMT -6
12 days now.....a traitor to America. Oh yeah, impeach his ass too. Lets have one more insurrection to go please.
|
|
|
Post by Rob W. Case on Jan 8, 2021 23:59:30 GMT -6
12 days until the tables turn, and you and your ilk will not only be in the HOT seat, but you will fall over making a spectacle of yourself as you make inane excuses for that turbo corrupt, lifelong career politician and dementia patient, with decades of real ties to Russia (since you seem to be obsessive compulsive about that country) as he ruins the country, causes massive job losses and despair, and proves that in his sick mental state, he will be even the more incompetent as he leads the nation into decisions that lack healthy coherence and will endanger the lives of millions down the road. And when we hold him accountable, you will have to defend his incompetence. It's going to be more than just a circus. It's going to be a circus runned by a "killer clown posse".
|
|
|
Post by bostondave on Jan 9, 2021 21:21:47 GMT -6
There's a revolution and a death coming. This was evil and traitorous conduct that has doomed the death cultists.
|
|