|
Post by LlalassuSkry on Dec 12, 2017 19:43:52 GMT -6
Amazingly, the accusations against Roy Moore, running for Alabama Senate, have been all fabrications- apparently the liberals involved have a self-conception that they're so elite, and so superior in every way, that as agents they feel justified in manufacturing lies! Providence has not allowed this conspiracy to have much effect- and you should be thankful for the Provision, of having just the right person in office- Trump- who has also been targeted with accusations which are every bit as false as those directed at Moore! I say this is the unequivocal Truth- about 13 women stepped forward, accusing Trump of what in current society has become an extremely sensitive accusation- and this is all the result of a fierce distonic affect with the Republicans, who have made the left-wingers rather like the Perdition party, for the present... Again, there is perhaps a power of illusion which makes the liberals believe they are The Chosen Ones Party, the republicans just being basically a bunch of roughnecks! They probably believe they are justified in dirty lying! The current liberal party reminds me of the Roman emperor Nero, who played his violin luxuriously while Rome was burning down- The Nero Party might be a good nickname! The New Aeon is, as I interpret, very bad for the Liberal Party, as it has been formulated, generally- I don't think it's going to be utterly, permanently squashed, however; presently with them it's a little like that final note in the Monty Python opening theme song music, a very "up" military-type march- the final chord or note sounds just like a huge elephant foot squashing someone, or some people! Really, the liberals are totally out of sync with what is indicated as needful, currently- and they're vain about it and about their party, too...
|
|
|
Post by bostondave on Dec 25, 2017 15:43:17 GMT -6
Was looking for how accusations against Drumpf have been "amazingly false". Instead was treated to no real facts about how accusations against Roy Moore have been false. Haven't seen anything specifying what and how for either.
|
|
|
Post by Rob W. Case on Jan 18, 2018 11:46:48 GMT -6
What’s amazing to me is that in every case of genuine sexual harassment charges, there are certain procedures that are supposed to be followed by the accuser and their lawyer to investigate the matter to try and dig for the truth. In the cases of both Moore and Trump, neither one followed these procedures. And what’s even more interesting is that both cases are being handled by the same lawyer who has both an agenda and strong partisan political biases against those being accused.
That said; let’s start by looking at President Trump’s case. Trump has been a billionaire with celebrity status for decades. The status alone attracts scores of loose women who are ready, willing, and able to throw themselves at rich celebrities for some form of monetary or career advancement. That said, the lawyer handling this case, Gloria Allred (an outspoken operative for the Democrat National Committee, who served as a delegate for Hillary Clinton’s campaign, and openly serves the interests and advancement of the Democrat Party) knows this full well (being a Hollywood attorney) and is leading the allegations against Trump. On top of that, her daughter, Lisa Bloom, (who shares in similar political interests as her mother) offered up to $750,000 to a woman who was reluctant to accuse President Trump of harassment in hopes to change her mind. Corruption in forcing a desired outcome is very evident here.
And then there is Roy Moore. The politics involved in his case is that, in the world of national politics, his election in Alabama was seen as a crucial one in that if he won, it would have been a victory for the direction of the Trump agenda. Now for years, love him or hate him, Moore was known to be (especially in certain socially conservative evangelical circles) a very moral and upstanding man. And yet, in just about every election that Democrats see as crucial to preserving or advancing their agenda, they worked very hard to do all they could to dirty up a good reputation with treacherous allegations and accusations in hopes to muster up contemptible attitudes against him. However, once the details underwent the scrutiny of investigation, testimonies conflicted as details regarding the people, place(s), and events lacked consistency, the foundation began falling apart, yet the "mainstream media" would never report it, but instead would "report" on each new charge, giving more influence to the accusations instead of facts. And in the one accusation against Moore, where a yearbook by his accuser is said to have a message supposedly written by him along with his signature, suspicious activity began to happen when it came down to actually investigate the authenticity of the signature, the age of the ink used, and so forth. As the examination was about to move forward, Gloria Allred refused to allow examiners to study the yearbook and the signature within it. And yet in the end, Moore lost the election, nothing real or damning has come of the accusations, and now the media doesn’t even mention it, as if it completely fell off the face of the earth.
Real cases don’t do that.
The overall point is that both of these “cases” are severely lacking substantiated facts and evidence, but it is thick and heavy with agenda driven politics that has been overdramatized and amplified by the media in order to influence an outcome in favor of the Democrat Party. They seem to regularly adopt the Harry Reid approach which is practically; It doesn’t matter you say or do, as long as the guy we want wins in the end.
|
|
|
Post by bostondave on Jan 18, 2018 19:11:57 GMT -6
Anything about Drumpf? Moore is kinda old news. He was a perv, he's a known liar, and doesn't believe in the Constitution. Your typical con. Has he even conceded yet? Bet he hasn't. It seems the more con you are the wackier you are.
|
|
|
Post by Rob W. Case on Jan 19, 2018 17:18:41 GMT -6
He was a perv, he's a known liar, and doesn't believe in the Constitution. Your typical con. It seems the more con you are the wackier you are. Really? Enlighten us. Fact based specifics & examples would be nice.
|
|
|
Post by bostondave on Feb 14, 2018 7:26:13 GMT -6
He was a perv, he's a known liar, and doesn't believe in the Constitution. Your typical con. It seems the more con you are the wackier you are. Really? Enlighten us. Fact based specifics & examples would be nice.I already have. The one at hand is example enough.
|
|
|
Post by Pepper on Apr 29, 2018 18:21:26 GMT -6
Well here we are 4 months later, and Mueller should be wrapping things up to a close. It would be nice to get back to the work of cleaning out the waste in Washington DC. Taxpayer are paying way too much for wasteful projects. Like the one with the EPA gassing bunnies with diesel fumes to see how much it takes to kill them. Seriously..WASHINGTON – The "EPA Sucks." That's the name of White Coat Waste Project's latest campaign to end what they call outdated, wasteful experiments on animals conducted on the taxpayers' dime.
"We're talking about 20,000 animals a year, millions – millions of tax dollars – multi-million dollar programs," said Anthony Bellotti, president and founder of White Coat Waste Project.
"We're talking about forcing bunnies to inhale diesel truck exhaust," he continued. "We're talking about terrifying pregnant moms with loud noises, electroshocking babies. We're talking force-feeding mice and rats to the point of obesity and then expose them to this outdated pollution."
|
|
|
Post by bostondave on Jun 3, 2018 12:09:41 GMT -6
Not sure why anything should be wrapping up. There was a whole lotta collusion going on. At least a half dozen secret meetings with Russians for at least around 20 meetings. All lied about. Each and every one of them. Lied. Takes awhile to get all the data on all that colluding.
|
|
|
Post by Rob W. Case on Jun 3, 2018 18:38:29 GMT -6
Not sure why anything should be wrapping up. There was a whole lotta collusion going on. At least a half dozen secret meetings with Russians for at least around 20 meetings. All lied about. Each and every one of them. Lied. Takes awhile to get all the data on all that colluding. I don't know where you've been lately, bostondave, but this "Russia collusion thing" has gone too far for so long, yielding absolutely no shred of evidence of collusion, that a federal judge stepped in and reprimanded Mueller on both his overstepping his authority, charging him directly of using this as a means to try and bring down Trump, and demanding that Mueller disclose what he has (if he has anything at all) to investigate the "investigation". If Russia is so bad, and colluding with them is so serious, then Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton would have to be called in to have their dealings (especially their arms dealings) with Russia investigated. And Hillary's dealings in providing uranium (which is a component used for nuclear bombs) to them would be significantly serious and damaging. But no, there is nothing at all concerning these factors. So that alone tells me that the elements of a banana Republic (of which the American political class cannot perfect, at least yet) are actively at work trying all they can to circumvent the democratic process which elected Donald Trump to office, and in so doing, protect, defend, and secure the system that the Washington D.C. ilk depends on to enrich itself, force its will on the people, and shield itself from accountability from the American people. Lawlessness that favors one party, and the extreme "enforcement of laws" that are only used against a person who is not liked, reveals politics of the dirtiest kind. And the "Russia thing" speaks louder on that aspect than it could ever reveal about actual collusion with Russia.
|
|
|
Post by bostondave on Jun 8, 2018 11:25:48 GMT -6
Theres a literal metric ton of evidence. There're 16 indictments, 5 guilties....something close to that. And it's still not gone on as long as Benghazi/email, or whitewater/monica.
You're just not very bright at all.
And oh did I say there's a metric ton of circumstantial evidence of Russia collusion? In your next post perhaps you could explain the numerous secret meetings with russians that were all lied about. I'd be interested in hearing your take. Oh and don't forget to include Jrs meeting with the group of russians in Drumpf tower with the campaign leaders and gaggle of russian spies that daddy Drumpf has admitted now to have lied about.
Go.
|
|
|
Post by Rob W. Case on Jun 8, 2018 22:31:20 GMT -6
Theres a literal metric ton of evidence. There're 16 indictments, 5 guilties....something close to that. And it's still not gone on as long as Benghazi/email, or whitewater/monica. Where is this evidence? You boast that there is a ton of evidence that Trump colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 election, so you won't have a problem then.
Also, you conveniently blew over my point about the seriousness of the dangers of Russia and President Obama and Hillary Clinton's dealings with them. What do you have to say about their high profile dealings with Russia and why all of that is glossed over by Mueller. I mean, if Russia is that bad, then why was Hillary selling uranium to them?You're just not very bright at all. And oh did I say there's a metric ton of circumstantial evidence of Russia collusion? In your next post perhaps you could explain the numerous secret meetings with russians that were all lied about. I'd be interested in hearing your take. Oh and don't forget to include Jrs meeting with the group of russians in Drumpf tower with the campaign leaders and gaggle of russian spies that daddy Drumpf has admitted now to have lied about. Go. You guys on the left have a reputation of running on conjecture, appearances, generalities, suspicious conspiracy theories, and/or outright fabrications, and from there, overdramatizing and amplifying that drama. Based on just the facts, the evidence (where there is an outright violation of code in accordance to the primary charge leveled against the accused), and the convictions of conspiracy that places the accused in some form of treasonous conduct at the expense of the United States, there is no concrete evidence.
What say you?
|
|
|
Post by bostondave on Jun 8, 2018 23:37:58 GMT -6
Theres a literal metric ton of evidence. There're 16 indictments, 5 guilties....something close to that. And it's still not gone on as long as Benghazi/email, or whitewater/monica. Where is this evidence? You boast that there is a ton of evidence that Trump colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 election, so you won't have a problem then.
Also, you conveniently blew over my point about the seriousness of the dangers of Russia and President Obama and Hillary Clinton's dealings with them. What do you have to say about their high profile dealings with Russia and why all of that is glossed over by Mueller. I mean, if Russia is that bad, then why was Hillary selling uranium to them?You're just not very bright at all. And oh did I say there's a metric ton of circumstantial evidence of Russia collusion? In your next post perhaps you could explain the numerous secret meetings with russians that were all lied about. I'd be interested in hearing your take. Oh and don't forget to include Jrs meeting with the group of russians in Drumpf tower with the campaign leaders and gaggle of russian spies that daddy Drumpf has admitted now to have lied about. Go. You guys on the left have a reputation of running on conjecture, appearances, generalities, suspicious conspiracy theories, and/or outright fabrications, and from there, overdramatizing and amplifying that drama. Based on just the facts, the evidence (where there is an outright violation of code in accordance to the primary charge leveled against the accused), and the convictions of conspiracy that places the accused in some form of treasonous conduct at the expense of the United States, there is no concrete evidence.
What say you?A metric ton of evidence. The multitude of secret meetings between russian operatives and Drumpf campaign. All lied about. Thats your metric ton. And then there's the tower meeting with the gaggle of russian spies and operatives and the top of the campaign and Jr. That was collusion, attempted collusion. And Drumpf helped them lie about it. Again, there's a metric ton. You got anything at all to say about all the evidences?
|
|
|
Post by bostondave on Jun 10, 2018 12:02:26 GMT -6
What happened, cat steal your tongue?
|
|
|
Post by Rob W. Case on Jun 10, 2018 23:11:17 GMT -6
I'm waiting on you to provide an answer that is a little more competent and substantial than just saying that there is a "metric ton of evidence" and exhibiting conjecture and generalities as the evidence. In other words, what exactly is the secret or illegal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the Russian government, and why would they support Trump over Hillary when a Hillary presidency would have benefitted the Russians far more than a Trump presidency?
|
|
|
Post by bostondave on Jun 11, 2018 5:40:39 GMT -6
I'm waiting on you to provide an answer that is a little more competent and substantial than just saying that there is a "metric ton of evidence" and exhibiting conjecture and generalities as the evidence. In other words, what exactly is the secret or illegal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the Russian government, and why would they support Trump over Hillary when a Hillary presidency would have benefitted the Russians far more than a Trump presidency? OK, the secret meeting, also lied about, between Jr., Kushner and Campaign Chair Manafort, with a gaggle of russian spies. The same meeting that Drumpf himself involved himself in covering up and lying about. Is that concrete and specific enough? That was collusion, or conspiracy, or treason. Surely you've got something to say about that?
|
|