Post by Rob W. Case on Nov 10, 2009 2:42:43 GMT -6
The recent attack at Fort Hood in Texas, where an Army Major by the name of Nidal Malik Hasan who opened fire on 43 of his fellow soldiers, killing 12 and injuring 31, is currently in critical condition after being shot 4 times in an attempt to stop him from killing and injuring more. But there is more to the story, and the media (aside from Fox News and talk radio) is not really covering it. Before Hasan fired on his fellow soldiers, he shouted, the words "Allah Akbar" which is Arabic for “God is great,” and is normally shouted before a terrorist conducts a mass murder (normally a suicide bombing). But what really concerns me in this matter is that the media is trying their hardest to downplay the fact that the man is a radical Muslim who shares sympathies to terrorist activities.
It doesn’t stop there. How many of you are actually aware of the latest terrorist attempts by Muslim extremists to kill Americans?
A Quick Little Review:
During the week of September 21st, 2009 there was….
*A plan to detonate TATP (triacetone triperoxide bombs which can be assembled with chemicals common in every household) bombs on the New York City subway. Najibullah Zazi, a 24-year-old Afghan received training in Pakistan on how to make the bomb and attended an Al Qaeda training camp.
*In Dallas Texas, a 19 year old Jordanian by the name of Hosam Maher Husein Smadi tried to bomb a Dallas skyscraper. The Feds caught him by disguising themselves as terror cell members who supplied him with a fake bomb, but his trying to detonate it was the action needed for them to bust him, as he thought it was real.
*In Springfield Illinois, an American man by the name of Michael Finton was arrested after attempting to detonate a car bomb which he thought was filled with explosives at the Paul Findley Federal Building and Courthouse.
*Most recently, on October 21st, a Boston resident by the name of Tarek Mehanna was charged with conspiracy to kill two U.S. politicians, American troops in Iraq, and civilians in local shopping malls.
This recent attack at Fort Hood has brought the numbers up to five, and all within the time frame of a month and a half. But why is most of the press leaving out the details that matter? There are two main reasons why the media is downplaying the seriousness of these attempts.
1. To actively protect Obama
2. To permit the further infiltration of people of this mindset.
Protecting Obama:
Let me illustrate this carefully. Last year Barack Obama won record support amongst Muslims in America and abroad. As such, he has feverishly tried to bend over backwards to win political support of not just regular peaceful Muslims, but extremist Muslims as well. Hasan’s former superior Retired Col Terry Lee told Fox News that Hasan supported Barack Obama for president last year, but was disappointed this year when Obama did not bring the troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan. But in Obama’s world, politics is politics, and attracting everyone to your side is the name of the game in politics, especially when you lack decent moral constraints. He and his administration’s efforts to release terrorists from Guantanamo Bay, his implementation of making U.S. soldiers read Miranda rights to terrorists on the battlefield (which is something soldiers will have to tell you themselves), and these attempts (which get no profile at all from the “mainstream media”) to grant arrested terrorists American Constitutional rights is far beyond anything moderately normal. All of these actions, I’m convinced have emboldened the enemy to new degrees, and I believe without a doubt in my mind, that those moves, and others (that we are probably not even aware of), have emboldened, energized, and aided our enemies in Afghanistan and why all of a sudden, it is now so “difficult” for us to win over there. U.S. soldiers are getting killed all the time, the fighting has intensified, but you either hear nothing about it from our news media, or you barely hear about it. Like I said, you either have to tune into Fox News, talk radio, go to publications outside of the country, or just know somebody who is dealing with this stuff first hand to be able to obtain this information. That is evil. It is politically motivated, and it is dangerous. It is dangerous because it sets a trap. Terrorism is no way a matter that should be taken lightly. If people are not aware of a possible looming danger, they cannot be prepared to either avoid it or prevent it. But if this looming danger is a danger because of a radical religion, shouldn’t we at least be aware of it? The reason why the media is going out of their way to avoid these details is because he has some elaborate plans to keep the political support of Muslims, and if people are aware of all of this evil done by radical Muslims, then that would make Obama look bad, and they cannot have this.
Here are just a few plans that Obama has pending to cater to this group of constituents.
The appointment of Judge David Hamilton, an ACLU attorney who is considered to be appointed to the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals. Hamilton is an activist Judge who seeks to eliminate Christian prayers, but protects Muslim prayers. In his controversial ruling, Hinrichs v. Bosma, he wrote, “The injunction orders the Speaker...that the prayers should not use Christ's name or title or any other denominational appeal...If those offering prayers in the Indiana House of Representatives choose to use the Arabic 'Allah'...the court sees little risk that the choice of language would advance a particular religion or disparage others.”
The Support for initiating Sharia Law in the United States.
What is Sharia Law? Sharia Law is basically a code of law from the teachings and example of Muhammad. In other words, Sharia Law affects government laws, ethics, rules and so forth. What makes Sharia Law dangerous is that certain writings of Muhammad in one book conflict with other writings of Muhammad in another book. That is one of the reasons why Muslims are killing Muslims in other nations. Sharia Law could provide protection for violent extremes if enacted. Of course, if we adopted Sharia Law in the United States, the entire dynamic would change and lawyers would make out big, especially Muslims who specialize in Sharia Law. But here are some extremes that should be considered before making any decision.
Read this article:
Top ten reasons why sharia is bad for all societies
www.americanthinker.com/2005/08/top_ten_reasons_why_sharia_is.html
If Sharia Law was enacted, and people like Nidal Malik Hasan who opened fire on his fellow soldiers in the name of Allah, it is possible that Hasan could get off in the sense that he is only practicing what Muhammad taught, and if Sharia Law is based on Muhammad's teachings, then Sharia Law could possibly be used to protect him. Sharia Law is a law that many in the Muslim community have wanted for a very long time. In March of 2009, President Obama nominated lawyer Harold Koh. The New York Post ran an article about him in March that may add a little insight to the bigger picture.
Read this article:
OBAMA'S MOST PERILOUS LEGAL PICK
www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/obama_most_perilous_legal_pick_yyMKJnrmyV5g5MZlhheZOP
In the article, it said that, “Koh claimed that "in an appropriate case, he didn't see any reason why sharia law would not be applied to govern a case in the United States.
In many other nations where Sharia Law is the law of the land, there are major problems in store for those who either depart from the Muslim faith, are Christians, or express freedom to choose other than what is dictated within the confines of the Quran, Hadith, Sira, and other writings of Muhammad.
Also, let’s not forget that recently one of President Obama’s faith advisory council board members, Dalia Mogahed recently appeared on a TV show in Britain with Islamic extremists.
Read the article here:
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobama/6274387/Obama-adviser-says-Sharia-Law-is-misunderstood.html
Excerpt:
The White House adviser made the remarks on a London-based TV discussion programme hosted by Ibtihal Bsis, a member of the extremist Hizb ut Tahrir party. The group believes in the non-violent destruction of Western democracy and the creation of an Islamic state under Sharia Law across the world.
Protecting Islam by Initiating Anti-Free Speech Measures:
Human Events recently wrote about a measure that the “mainstream” press would never tell you about. The Obama Administration, co-sponsored with the United Nations and the U.N. Human Rights Council a resolution that would in its own criminalize, “any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence.”
Read the article:
Obama Declares War on Free Speech
www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&id=33869
Excerpt:
“The powerful can decide to silence the powerless by classifying their views as “hate speech.”
Can the Obama administration arrange it so that legal action could be taken towards someone who simply calls it as it is by simply telling the truth?
Assembling the Bigger Picture:
Taking in all of what I mentioned today, I have these thought provoking questions.
*Is Barack Obama a Muslim personally?
*Is Barack Obama gearing up to be president of the world, trying his hardest to make nice with Muslims in the United States and the rest of the world? Why are his advisors going to Europe to appear on such television programs?
*Is Barack Obama forming a radical political coalition that could help lead him get re-elected in 2012? This leads me into my second point.
To permit the further infiltration of people of this mindset:
Immigration. Immigration will be a key factor in 2010 and 2012. Since 9/11 Muslims have migrated to America from the Middle East in record numbers making them a growing political constituency, thus voters. I’m not saying that necessarily as a bad thing, but since the liberal Democrat politicians today have no moral constraints whatsoever and whose philosophy is to win at any and all costs, I wouldn’t be at all surprised if they would open the borders to allow extremists in, make them voters, and use their votes to keep them in power. I would expect such behavior from them. They are seriously that selfish, that contemptuous, and that radical.
What does that do for us?
Islamic extremism is and has always been a very potent threat. It has always had the same goals and it has never changed. Thomas Jefferson, John Adams. And Ben Franklin encountered this first hand in 1784 when they were commissioned by the first congress in relation to marketing U.S. products in Europe. The merchant ships sending goods overseas were attacked by pirates. As such, they would use the money to build more warships, buy more weaponry, and sell the people on those ships into slavery, or hold them for ransom. Morally outraged at what the pirates had done, Jefferson and Adams went to Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdrahaman, and asked him what right had they to do such horrible acts. Jefferson stated the answer in his report to Secretary of State John Jay, and to the Congress:
“The ambassador answered us that it was founded on the Laws of the Prophet, that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.”
Today, as we continue to slip away from the principles of our founding, we are accepting, pandering, and catering to a constituency whose goal is to force the world into becoming a one world Islamic state, or at least die trying, taking many others by violent force with them. And yet my concern is, knowing that these radical traits are a part of the fabric of their religion and Obama’s ties with the radical elements, by the press leaving out the elements that have to do with Islamic extremism, doesn’t that initiate a climate in which people may walk into a certain situation for which they might get killed? Simply being unaware of a looming danger is as powerful and having a blindfold wrapped around your eyes. You would simply just walk into whatever danger is around you. The problem I have is that the manufacturers of those blindfolds are making them out of blind loyalty to the man they love most.
It doesn’t stop there. How many of you are actually aware of the latest terrorist attempts by Muslim extremists to kill Americans?
A Quick Little Review:
During the week of September 21st, 2009 there was….
*A plan to detonate TATP (triacetone triperoxide bombs which can be assembled with chemicals common in every household) bombs on the New York City subway. Najibullah Zazi, a 24-year-old Afghan received training in Pakistan on how to make the bomb and attended an Al Qaeda training camp.
*In Dallas Texas, a 19 year old Jordanian by the name of Hosam Maher Husein Smadi tried to bomb a Dallas skyscraper. The Feds caught him by disguising themselves as terror cell members who supplied him with a fake bomb, but his trying to detonate it was the action needed for them to bust him, as he thought it was real.
*In Springfield Illinois, an American man by the name of Michael Finton was arrested after attempting to detonate a car bomb which he thought was filled with explosives at the Paul Findley Federal Building and Courthouse.
*Most recently, on October 21st, a Boston resident by the name of Tarek Mehanna was charged with conspiracy to kill two U.S. politicians, American troops in Iraq, and civilians in local shopping malls.
This recent attack at Fort Hood has brought the numbers up to five, and all within the time frame of a month and a half. But why is most of the press leaving out the details that matter? There are two main reasons why the media is downplaying the seriousness of these attempts.
1. To actively protect Obama
2. To permit the further infiltration of people of this mindset.
Protecting Obama:
Let me illustrate this carefully. Last year Barack Obama won record support amongst Muslims in America and abroad. As such, he has feverishly tried to bend over backwards to win political support of not just regular peaceful Muslims, but extremist Muslims as well. Hasan’s former superior Retired Col Terry Lee told Fox News that Hasan supported Barack Obama for president last year, but was disappointed this year when Obama did not bring the troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan. But in Obama’s world, politics is politics, and attracting everyone to your side is the name of the game in politics, especially when you lack decent moral constraints. He and his administration’s efforts to release terrorists from Guantanamo Bay, his implementation of making U.S. soldiers read Miranda rights to terrorists on the battlefield (which is something soldiers will have to tell you themselves), and these attempts (which get no profile at all from the “mainstream media”) to grant arrested terrorists American Constitutional rights is far beyond anything moderately normal. All of these actions, I’m convinced have emboldened the enemy to new degrees, and I believe without a doubt in my mind, that those moves, and others (that we are probably not even aware of), have emboldened, energized, and aided our enemies in Afghanistan and why all of a sudden, it is now so “difficult” for us to win over there. U.S. soldiers are getting killed all the time, the fighting has intensified, but you either hear nothing about it from our news media, or you barely hear about it. Like I said, you either have to tune into Fox News, talk radio, go to publications outside of the country, or just know somebody who is dealing with this stuff first hand to be able to obtain this information. That is evil. It is politically motivated, and it is dangerous. It is dangerous because it sets a trap. Terrorism is no way a matter that should be taken lightly. If people are not aware of a possible looming danger, they cannot be prepared to either avoid it or prevent it. But if this looming danger is a danger because of a radical religion, shouldn’t we at least be aware of it? The reason why the media is going out of their way to avoid these details is because he has some elaborate plans to keep the political support of Muslims, and if people are aware of all of this evil done by radical Muslims, then that would make Obama look bad, and they cannot have this.
Here are just a few plans that Obama has pending to cater to this group of constituents.
The appointment of Judge David Hamilton, an ACLU attorney who is considered to be appointed to the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals. Hamilton is an activist Judge who seeks to eliminate Christian prayers, but protects Muslim prayers. In his controversial ruling, Hinrichs v. Bosma, he wrote, “The injunction orders the Speaker...that the prayers should not use Christ's name or title or any other denominational appeal...If those offering prayers in the Indiana House of Representatives choose to use the Arabic 'Allah'...the court sees little risk that the choice of language would advance a particular religion or disparage others.”
The Support for initiating Sharia Law in the United States.
What is Sharia Law? Sharia Law is basically a code of law from the teachings and example of Muhammad. In other words, Sharia Law affects government laws, ethics, rules and so forth. What makes Sharia Law dangerous is that certain writings of Muhammad in one book conflict with other writings of Muhammad in another book. That is one of the reasons why Muslims are killing Muslims in other nations. Sharia Law could provide protection for violent extremes if enacted. Of course, if we adopted Sharia Law in the United States, the entire dynamic would change and lawyers would make out big, especially Muslims who specialize in Sharia Law. But here are some extremes that should be considered before making any decision.
Read this article:
Top ten reasons why sharia is bad for all societies
www.americanthinker.com/2005/08/top_ten_reasons_why_sharia_is.html
If Sharia Law was enacted, and people like Nidal Malik Hasan who opened fire on his fellow soldiers in the name of Allah, it is possible that Hasan could get off in the sense that he is only practicing what Muhammad taught, and if Sharia Law is based on Muhammad's teachings, then Sharia Law could possibly be used to protect him. Sharia Law is a law that many in the Muslim community have wanted for a very long time. In March of 2009, President Obama nominated lawyer Harold Koh. The New York Post ran an article about him in March that may add a little insight to the bigger picture.
Read this article:
OBAMA'S MOST PERILOUS LEGAL PICK
www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/obama_most_perilous_legal_pick_yyMKJnrmyV5g5MZlhheZOP
In the article, it said that, “Koh claimed that "in an appropriate case, he didn't see any reason why sharia law would not be applied to govern a case in the United States.
In many other nations where Sharia Law is the law of the land, there are major problems in store for those who either depart from the Muslim faith, are Christians, or express freedom to choose other than what is dictated within the confines of the Quran, Hadith, Sira, and other writings of Muhammad.
Also, let’s not forget that recently one of President Obama’s faith advisory council board members, Dalia Mogahed recently appeared on a TV show in Britain with Islamic extremists.
Read the article here:
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobama/6274387/Obama-adviser-says-Sharia-Law-is-misunderstood.html
Excerpt:
The White House adviser made the remarks on a London-based TV discussion programme hosted by Ibtihal Bsis, a member of the extremist Hizb ut Tahrir party. The group believes in the non-violent destruction of Western democracy and the creation of an Islamic state under Sharia Law across the world.
Protecting Islam by Initiating Anti-Free Speech Measures:
Human Events recently wrote about a measure that the “mainstream” press would never tell you about. The Obama Administration, co-sponsored with the United Nations and the U.N. Human Rights Council a resolution that would in its own criminalize, “any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence.”
Read the article:
Obama Declares War on Free Speech
www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&id=33869
Excerpt:
“The powerful can decide to silence the powerless by classifying their views as “hate speech.”
Can the Obama administration arrange it so that legal action could be taken towards someone who simply calls it as it is by simply telling the truth?
Assembling the Bigger Picture:
Taking in all of what I mentioned today, I have these thought provoking questions.
*Is Barack Obama a Muslim personally?
*Is Barack Obama gearing up to be president of the world, trying his hardest to make nice with Muslims in the United States and the rest of the world? Why are his advisors going to Europe to appear on such television programs?
*Is Barack Obama forming a radical political coalition that could help lead him get re-elected in 2012? This leads me into my second point.
To permit the further infiltration of people of this mindset:
Immigration. Immigration will be a key factor in 2010 and 2012. Since 9/11 Muslims have migrated to America from the Middle East in record numbers making them a growing political constituency, thus voters. I’m not saying that necessarily as a bad thing, but since the liberal Democrat politicians today have no moral constraints whatsoever and whose philosophy is to win at any and all costs, I wouldn’t be at all surprised if they would open the borders to allow extremists in, make them voters, and use their votes to keep them in power. I would expect such behavior from them. They are seriously that selfish, that contemptuous, and that radical.
What does that do for us?
Islamic extremism is and has always been a very potent threat. It has always had the same goals and it has never changed. Thomas Jefferson, John Adams. And Ben Franklin encountered this first hand in 1784 when they were commissioned by the first congress in relation to marketing U.S. products in Europe. The merchant ships sending goods overseas were attacked by pirates. As such, they would use the money to build more warships, buy more weaponry, and sell the people on those ships into slavery, or hold them for ransom. Morally outraged at what the pirates had done, Jefferson and Adams went to Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdrahaman, and asked him what right had they to do such horrible acts. Jefferson stated the answer in his report to Secretary of State John Jay, and to the Congress:
“The ambassador answered us that it was founded on the Laws of the Prophet, that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.”
Today, as we continue to slip away from the principles of our founding, we are accepting, pandering, and catering to a constituency whose goal is to force the world into becoming a one world Islamic state, or at least die trying, taking many others by violent force with them. And yet my concern is, knowing that these radical traits are a part of the fabric of their religion and Obama’s ties with the radical elements, by the press leaving out the elements that have to do with Islamic extremism, doesn’t that initiate a climate in which people may walk into a certain situation for which they might get killed? Simply being unaware of a looming danger is as powerful and having a blindfold wrapped around your eyes. You would simply just walk into whatever danger is around you. The problem I have is that the manufacturers of those blindfolds are making them out of blind loyalty to the man they love most.